Aug 31

For years Tiesto has been electronic music’s whipping boy and the butt of jokes in DJ circles… From his propagating of “teh trance aids” to the almighty “Jesus Pose” and his lackluster mixing abilities, he has been the one people love to hate.

But that’s so 2008!

The times are a-changing, and the Deadmau5 hate club has built just as fast as his rise to fame.

But does it really matter? Tiesto is still one of the world’s top booked (and paid) jocks. And as much hate as the Mau5 gets, he’s got more fans than ever. Sure, his social media tiff with Rusko drew some criticism, and his recent collapse during a show had people saying some pretty tasteless things, but let’s face it, the Mau5 has it going on. Hit singles, huge albums, sold-out shows, world tours, and kids everywhere making Mau5-heads. A record deal with Virgin. A chance to be the official MTV Music Awards DJ. And the list goes on and on…

SELL-OUTS:

I’d say a large part of the hate comes from those people that don’t like anything or anyone once it gets too big. Some will argue once (or even “if”) an artist has mainstream or commercial success he has sold out; has abandoned the Fans for the Fame. Has become lazy. Or any of the other tired and usually untrue (but not always, mind you) excuses the haters will toss out for not liking somebody. But is selling out (if this is even the case) always bad? No — but I’ll pick this up in a later post…

FRESHNESS:

People want to be the first in their circle to discover something new. And when too many people know about it, they move on to the next new thing. Simple.

It may also be about over-exposure. If an artist is everywhere you look, if the music is in everyone’s mix and monthly charts, if the jock is constantly being talked about on the web, then some people might get turned off. This happens in Top 40 radio all the time. Even the good songs, when played every hour, every day, get old fast. People stop listening.

But the more exposure an artist gets — the more ears he reaches — usually means the more new members will join the tribe. You’ve got to take the good with the bad.

ATTITUDE:

Sometimes fame gets to people. It makes them cocky or overconfident. It makes them paranoid. It takes them off “The Streets” and puts them in “The Tower” or simply puts a wedge between the artist and the fans. Not always, but this is often the case. Unintentional? Usually. Unavoidable? Sometimes. But some level of frustration is understandable, even expected. It’s hard to find somebody that isn’t affected by the constant pressure to always be on top, not to mention the stress fans and media could cause… But that’s the price you pay. Right?

Sure, some artists are able to paste a smile up for the Public and hold everything back while the cameras are rolling. But for how long?

THE MUSIC:

Or it could simply be the music.

Yes, maybe the early projects by the artist were indeed better. It’s all relative, I suppose. I love early stuff from Bad Boy Bill but can’t stand his recent sound. Has the artist changed his style, or has the sound or scene changed, making the artist adapt? Probably a bit of both. After all, an artist that isn’t constantly experimenting, trying new things, and pushing the envelope a bit further than his last project probably won’t have the longevity of someone who does. These are the flash-in-the-pan guys. The one hit wonders.

Then again, push too hard, too far, too fast, and you may lose just as many fans. There is a fine line between genius and insanity, after all. And if you’re going to walk the line you need to be ready to fall. You need to be ready to take the good and the bad. Take the critics with the fans.

And don’t take things too personally.

Aug 18

I’m still amazed to hear people shooting down Digital Deejaying as “cheating” and “uncreative” – but is it really? Or are these naysayers just part of the dying school of purists?

The Show

Sure, Digital Deejaying is not necessarily as “hands on” as diggin’ thru a record box to find the perfect vinyl and twirling it onto the turntable (or even flipping thru a CD book for your next song)… But does that matter?

I’ll admit, somebody standing in the Booth staring at a Laptop for two hours isn’t very exciting. But most jocks use some type of hardware along with the computer, whether it’s an ACP40 or a DVS system or any of the other controllers, platters, or performance tools available today. They are able to manipulate the music with their hands just as much as a Vinyl jock. And while it doesn’t quite match the same stereotypical image of what a DJ “should” be, it’s still fun to watch a master at work.

The Music

The music is what matters in the end, right? Not where the music comes from or how it’s played. The average clubber is out for the experience. They don’t care who the songs are by as long as they are good (hell, they probably couldn’t name most of the songs or artists anyway)… And they don’t care how the jock gets the job done, as long as it gets the floor poppin’ off. It’s really only other DJs that will criticize somebody for the gear they use. So if a Digital kit gets the same (or better!) results as the old skool Frisbee, what’s the difference?

The DJ

Now step into the Booth. You’re the DJ. Which direction do you take? Sure, Vinyl brings image points from hoi polloi and props from jaded purists. But Digital brings you options and versatility. No need to carry around the heavy crate all evening. No need to worry about scratched records or a bumped or skipping needle. Your music is at your fingertips. And you can cut and chop and mash. Loop and sample and tweak songs on the fly. Work in some FX and heavy EQing. Things the guys in the booth 10 years ago just couldn’t do. Sure, less time may be spent matching beats, but that’s more time that could be used doing other things.

And so?

If you had access to tools that would make your job easier, why wouldn’t you take advantage of them? Sure, riding horses is fun every now and then, but a car is more practical and efficient. Is driving an automobile cheating? If you can get better results with less effort, does that make you a cheater?

I’m glad to see that most of the dance music community has accepted (if not embraced) the fact that Digital Deejaying is here to stay; it’s the future. But every now and then I hear a dinosaur growling about the way things used to be, and all I can do is shake my head and wonder when they will finally go extinct.

Aug 16

Newest of the free ‘ish from Elite Force… Also check out the vids from Wicker Man 2010!

Aug 16

Before there was The Cloud and MP3s, before there the iPod and compact discs, there were mixtapes*.

Early mixtapes were simply collections of recorded music – sometimes from vinyl or cassettes, sometimes from the radio, but often from other more creative (and hard to get) sources. But as dance music evolved, so too did the DJ mixtape.

It seems to me that the mixes today just don’t have the magic the little 4 X 3 treasure box of plastic held. But why? What was it about the Mixtape that made it so sought after? Back then it was two 30-minute episodes of continues dance music. The A Side was a bit friendlier and more upbeat featuring relatively popular tracks. The B Side had a bit more of an underground – or maybe afterhours – vibe. Sometimes even experimental. DJ mixes are pretty much the same now. So what’s different?

Back in the day, music wasn’t infinite. Sure, you could always duplicate the cassettes, but you needed to find them first. It wasn’t as simple as jumping into cyberspace with your eyes closed and arms open and scooping up any of the thousands of new mixes that go up every week. Today’s music is unlimited, and that effectively cuts their shelf-life down to almost nothing. There are very few mixes I listen to more than once or twice, and most of those getting continuous play are older mixes I picked up years ago. How often do you listen to same mix nowadays? And I can’t put my hands on an MP3. The missing tangibility takes away from the sense of ownership. But in theory it’s the same music, so why were Mixtapes more “fun”?

Maybe because they were something that used to bring us together at the multi-state parties. Something to show you were a part of the tribe. Mixtapes. Buy ‘em, sell ‘em, trade ‘em. Copy them with your friends and pass them on. The feeling I got when I stumbled upon a great mixtape from a new DJ, one that I’d never heard of, someone that rocks the decks several states away, THAT’S what it was all about.

And getting into a collection that’s traveled across the country? Priceless!

With almost everything available everywhere, that sense of belonging is lost. The pride of a hard-earned collection is gone. There isn’t much value in the current iteration of the mixtape.

Oh, and get off my lawn!

*"Mixtapes" is a generic term in contemporary culture to refer to any DJ mix or simply a collection of songs regardless of the medium or format.
Aug 11

Lynx @ Bar Standard (Photo by djElroy)

A few weeks back I was booked with some friends to host a house-session on a rooftop overlooking the majestic Mile High City. The promoter had multiple rooms of dubstep and related genres but for the sake of diversity we were asked to come in as the token straight-beat slangers.

We showed up early to check out some of the other acts… And “What the Fuck?” is all I can remember saying. What is this shit? Somebody please explain to me the appeal of this new sound… Take the attitude of hip hop, the fans of the dying (dead?) drum & bass scene, and the creativity of a Rock-em Sock-em Robot and you’ve got dubstep.

Think of it as the mutated love-child of garage and D&B — broken beats, frantic drums, heavy bass, and gritty synths, born with a five o’clock shadow and lead-pipe in hand, ready to club those unsuspecting punters about the head with it’s aggressive and often offensive sound.

Now I can understand sprinkling it into a set of mixed up music, but a 2-hour continuous mix of this by itself? DJ after DJ on the main stage? All night? No way!

It just wore my ears down, and I know I’m not the only one.

Yes, there are some amazing dubstep songs out there. I’m not saying there aren’t.

But just like fidget or electro-house before that or NRG before that or any other very distinct musical style, a little goes a long way.

And an entire set of the same thing goes too far.

Aug 9

An outrageous story blended with a how to guide to enjoy a truly insane party lifestyle. The film follows a group of Hollywood party-goers on their escapade as they travel from home to bar to party to after-party seeking the ultimate party experience. Through their adventure, viewers will learn truly insightful and at times politically incorrect lessons in nightlife etiquette, which will leave you feeling a bit dirty for enjoying it so much.

Aug 7

Every year when the polls open and the mud starts flying on the message boards there are always those outspoken critics of the Top 100 decrying it as simply being a popularity contest and a waste of time.

Sure it’s a popularity contest. But so what?

Isn’t music subjective? And isn’t the very point of these type of polls to find out who in the scene is the most popular? Who’s hot? Who is most appealing to the masses?

Maybe the naysayers believe the least popular artist should win? Maybe the only good electronic dance music is the “underground” stuff and everyone else has “sold out”?

Bottom line: it’s about how many people like a particular artist, regardless of the reasons they cast their votes. Sure, years past have seen some pretty cheesy jocks at the Top of the list, but anyone who has been around knows that the more underground the music is, by definition the less people know about it. Previous winners may not be the most skilled – I’m looking at you, Tiesto – but their ability to market themselves and connect with fans helps to get them to the top of the heap.

Maybe it’s this fact that that upsets folks. Shouldn’t the winners in a music poll win based on their music and not their marketability? Maybe. But the modern music industry isn’t just “about the music” anymore, it’s about everything — and this includes networking and marketing. Ain’t no shame in the game, yo.

I guess I just don’t understand why so many people complain about this being a popularity contest. I suppose you could rank each and every artist in terms of mixing skill, production value, ability to pick winning music, programming, technical skill, stage presence, marketing & promotion, fan interaction, personality, etc. DJs require all these skills and more (on some level) to make it.

Sure, you could do that. But doesn’t it take the fun out of it?

Hell, my picks aren’t the best in all these categories. But they are my favorites. They inspire me and their music is fun.

And isn’t that enough?

Aug 4

It’s that time of the year again: the DJ Mag Top 100 poll! Hooray. I mean it. Yippee. It’s when all of my favorite artists (and many of my not-so-favorite) spam me weekly, daily, hourly, or even more frequently, trying to win a vote.

Will I vote for you if you link to a free mix? Or a free single?

In a way I feel like I’m being bribed. But it’s an even more disappointing feeling to open an email with “Vote For Me!” in the subject line and not get anything. So it’s either bribe me or show me how little I mean by not giving me any incentive at all. It’s a lose/lose for the artist, right?

Well honestly I probably wouldn’t have chosen you anyway. A new mix or a track won’t get you my vote. I appreciate free stuff as much as the next guy, but if I only see free while the polls are open, well, you know where I’m going with this… A gift is only a gift if it’s given without any expectations.

Hell, a serious electronic dance music artist should be poppin’ out free mixes a few times a year anyway, whether they be podcasts, live mixes, guest spots on other shows, or good ol’ fashioned promo mixes.

But enough ranting; it’s time for my Top 5 picks of 2010. Pretty close to last year; I’ve considered the guys I think work the hardest and inspire me the most:

1) Paolo Mojo

2) Hernan Cattaneo

3) Christian Smith

4) Roger Sanchez

5) DJ Steve Porter

Do I think they’ll make the Top 10? No. But they’ve won my support over the years and I’d like to see them get some more recognition.

So who do I think will bag the Top Spots this year? Probably pretty close to last year. Trance. Tiesto, PVD, A&B, maybe AVB. The Swedish house sound is pretty big. Or maybe Laidback Luke? Guetta? Deadmau5? What about the old guard like Sasha or Digweed? New upstarts like Chuckie or Afrojack? It’s not likely we’ll see any dubstep jocks, right? And which US players will make the upper list?

I’d love to hear your predictions and votes.

Aug 2

I overheard some friends talking the other night about how vinyl is making a comeback.

Huh? Did I miss something?

Apparently more DJs have been seen around town carrying vinyl to gigs this summer… This led me to the next question: Which gigs? The big clubs here in town may still have turntables hidden away somewhere in a back room like a retarded stepchild, but the DJ booths are all digital now. Yes, some jocks may still need the decks to partner up with a laptop, but not to play vinyl. So where are these guys playing?

OK, maybe the old-school heads are boppin’ around the city, hunched over like a wax-slinging shirpa under the weight of an evenings worth of music. Maybe you’ll find them playing some hole-in-the-wall or underground gigs on a mismatched pair of Techs with a ghetto-rigged skate weight and a headshell that’s been taped onto a tonearm suffering from scoliosis.

But it’s not the norm. Hell, half (or more!) of the DJs playing gigs nowadays have never even handled a 12″, let alone spun a set that required more than pushing ‘play’ and giving the crowd some fist-pumps.

Sure, vinyl is still alive and well. For collectors and die-hards. For purists. There is still a relatively healthy used vinyl market for the enthusiasts. And some big labels are still living in the past, still trying to please those oh-gees that used to be the only ones that mattered. Still willing to take a loss in exchange for the bragging rights that they still press 12″ records. (Is this something to brag about or something to be embarrassed of?) Vinyl is good for hype. Promotions. It’s something tangible for the collectors. An advertising tool for small/indy labels and artists.

But for serious releases? No.

Over the past several years I’ve noticed more and more fire sales from the big labels trying to clear out their inventory of vinyl. Get it off the boat before the market completely dries up and the boat sinks for good. Have you tried to find someplace for plates, press, distribution lately? Good luck.

I thought this issue had been put to rest years ago. Not about the sound quality (yes, vinyl is still number one)… But it’s not really about the sound quality anymore, is it? “Good enough” is good enough. And organization, ease of acquiring, use, collecting, technology, and all the other pro-digital arguments outweigh any benefits of the dinosaur disc.

And on a side-note, CASSETTES aren’t coming back either. I’ve seen a few articles and conversations on the web and… no. Not gonna happen. A gimmick (and a clever one!) to be sure. But something to replace – or even live side by side with – digital? Never.

Jul 28

Let the annoying spam begin anew with this years DJ Mag Top 100 poll! (Actually I’ve already got quite a few goodies – bribes? – that I’ll be posting up over the next few days…

Who’s been rocking you iPod over the last 12 months? Who’s kept you raving ‘til 9am? Who’s dazzled you with their technical skills??

Your favourite DJs NEED your support! Head over to www.top100djs.net to cast your votes and you could see your musical hero crowned World’s Number One for 2010!

Every voter receives a free track download from Trackitdown.net, check your voter confirmation email for full details.

PLUS don’t forget to head down to DJmag Top 100 DJs party on October 27th where you can find out who’s stolen the show this year and hear the winner smash the dance floor apart…

« Previous Entries